Skip to Main Content

The Higher Standard for Emergency Room Negligence in Georgia: OCGA § 51-1-29.5(c)


In Georgia, as in most states,  state law establishes certain essential elements that must be present in order to file a medical malpractice claim.  These elements include negligence, causation, and damages. Negligence is established in medical malpractice cases by proving, more likely than not, that a doctor or other healthcare provider violated the standard of care. This simply means that the doctor did not act as a reasonable physician would have under the same or similar circumstances.

In a case stemming from care provided in an emergency room situation, there is a heightened legal standard of negligence that applies.  There is also a higher burden of proof (clear and convincing evidence as opposed to ‘more likely than not’). The rationale for this is because the emergency room  is often an environment where medical professionals make rapid decisions under intense pressure to provide life-saving care. Recognizing these challenges inherent in these situations, Georgia law imposes the higher standard of gross negligence, defined below. This legal standard is codified under OCGA § 51-1-29.5(c), which plays a pivotal role in shaping the liability framework for emergency room healthcare providers. 

Elements Involved in an Emergency Room Case

While the plaintiff must prove gross negligence at trial to prevail on an emergency room medical malpractice claim, there are also basic elements that must be present in order to initiate the lawsuit, as with all medical malpractice actions in Georgia.  Those include:

–   The existence of a doctor-patient relationship (duty);

–   The medical professional’s action or failure to act was a breach of the accepted standard of care (breach);

–   The injury was a direct result of the breach (causation); and

–   The patient suffered damages as a result of the injury (damages).

The attorneys at Chance,Forlines,Carter & King will review your file to determine whether these elements are likely present.  If we believe these elements are present, we will retain a medical expert to review your file.  The expert will examine the treating physician’s actions, compare the actions (or inactions) to the standard of care (i.e., what any other reasonable emergency room physician would do in the same circumstances), and also determine whether gross negligence occurred.

Understanding OCGA § 51-1-29.5(c)

OCGA § 51-1-29.5(c) outlines the specific legal standard that applies to emergency room healthcare providers in Georgia. The statute specifies:

“In an action involving a health care liability claim arising out of the provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department, no physician or health care provider shall be held liable unless it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the physician or health care provider’s actions showed gross negligence.”

This provision establishes that a plaintiff must demonstrate gross negligence to hold an emergency room healthcare provider liable.  Gross negligence typically involves the absence of any type of diligence or even a “slight degree of care,” or a conscious indifference to the consequences of one’s actions.

Impact on Legal Cases

OCGA § 51-1-29.5(c) significantly raises the bar for plaintiffs bringing claims of medical negligence against emergency room healthcare providers in Georgia. It acknowledges the unique challenges faced by healthcare professionals in emergency settings and aims to protect them from undue liability for reasonable decisions made under urgent conditions. Unfortunately, it also makes it sometimes difficult for patients and their families to seek accountability and justice, but each case is analyzed in light of its unique factors.

Challenges for Plaintiffs

As noted above, for plaintiffs pursuing claims under this statute, proving gross negligence requires thorough investigation and compelling evidence. Expert testimony and detailed documentation are often crucial in demonstrating that the healthcare provider’s actions went beyond mere negligence and constituted gross negligence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, to file any medical malpractice suit, certain elements must be met, including a doctor-patient relationship (establishing a duty owed to the patient), a breach of that duty by the medical professional, the breach caused an injury to the patient, and the patient suffered damages from the injury.  In an emergency room case, a higher standard for proving negligence has been established, called “gross negligence”.  OCGA § 51-1-29.5(c) requires plaintiffs to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the healthcare provider’s actions or omissions amounted to gross negligence – a standard that is designed in part to recognize the critical nature of emergency medical care while safeguarding healthcare providers from liability for reasonable judgments made under emergent circumstances. Understanding this legal framework is essential for both healthcare professionals and patients navigating the complexities of emergency room negligence claims in Georgia. For further guidance on such matters, contact the experienced team at Chance Forlines Carter & King, who routinely handle cases in all realms of medical malpractice.

Call CFCK Law Today!

At Chance, Forlines, Carter & King, PC, our Georgia medical malpractice attorneys are standing by, ready to help. Give us a call now or connect with us online to set up your free, fully confidential initial consultation. From our Atlanta offices and our Augusta office, we handle medical malpractice cases all across Georgia.